A small thing, but acknowledging photography sources is important. "Reddit" hardly gives credit to the photographer or even publisher. This is even more the case for for "Google Images", which is an agglomeration of images taken from most websites in existence. (Though the real publisher there, "Google Streetview," is at least part of the same company in this instance).
Imagine taking a paragraph or more of text from this article, quoting it in another, and referencing the text to "Substack" or "ChatGPT".
You can only suppress rising rents to the extent that you can suppress rising incomes. Building more, as a lot of high quality academic evidence shows, is at best a modest brake on rising prices, and primarily a cyclical, not a secular phenomenon.
A small thing, but acknowledging photography sources is important. "Reddit" hardly gives credit to the photographer or even publisher. This is even more the case for for "Google Images", which is an agglomeration of images taken from most websites in existence. (Though the real publisher there, "Google Streetview," is at least part of the same company in this instance).
Imagine taking a paragraph or more of text from this article, quoting it in another, and referencing the text to "Substack" or "ChatGPT".
You can only suppress rising rents to the extent that you can suppress rising incomes. Building more, as a lot of high quality academic evidence shows, is at best a modest brake on rising prices, and primarily a cyclical, not a secular phenomenon.
The government underwrites home mortgages
giving a cushion of security
which allows Lords of the Land to expect high rent fees.
There is plenty of unoccupied property .
Why would an owner even want a tenant if the real estate appreciation is rapid !
The tenant even becomes a liability.
London's social housing demolitions aren't always supported by tenants. See https://www.architectsforsocialhousing-design.co.uk/ for some alternatives to demolition.