Good post. We need an x-prize (or equivalent) for a company to create a safe, effective air sanitizer for under $500. And the promise to buy a million of them if it is done.
It's good to see Far-UVC gaining more attention. The safety, efficacy, and ozone/air quality issues are now effectively resolved, and the technology is completely safe, if used at the correct doseage and with a minimal level of ventilation. Recent research even suggests it's effective at chemically degrading airborne allergens, thus helping with asthma, and of course, unlike filtration, Far-UVC also helps degrade surface pathogens. Another very significant advantage is that UVC/Far-UVC is the one air cleaning technology that will align with net zero policies, given it's superior energy efficiency profile.
I wrote about the astonishing double standards applied to Far-UVC as a non-medical public health intervention in July 2024 - https://mattersofperspective.substack.com/p/a-tale-of-two-technologies These double standards really are holding back what should be the next public health revolution.
Such a great post, and so important! We're so close to adoption being possible its painful. I do think mass manufacturing of KrCl lamps wont be possible though and a new light source, LEDs, Second harmonic lasers, etc will be needed. I wrote a piece focusing on the development of far-UVC LEDs, which could mitigate many of those safety and efficiency issues.
Good post. We need an x-prize (or equivalent) for a company to create a safe, effective air sanitizer for under $500. And the promise to buy a million of them if it is done.
Couldn't agree more!
Maybe John Green could generate some interest in exploring this. He's promoting public attention on tuberculosis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D-gxaie6UI
How much of a problem is ozone formation for 222nm light? I've heard some debate about this but I'm not sure.
It's good to see Far-UVC gaining more attention. The safety, efficacy, and ozone/air quality issues are now effectively resolved, and the technology is completely safe, if used at the correct doseage and with a minimal level of ventilation. Recent research even suggests it's effective at chemically degrading airborne allergens, thus helping with asthma, and of course, unlike filtration, Far-UVC also helps degrade surface pathogens. Another very significant advantage is that UVC/Far-UVC is the one air cleaning technology that will align with net zero policies, given it's superior energy efficiency profile.
I wrote about the astonishing double standards applied to Far-UVC as a non-medical public health intervention in July 2024 - https://mattersofperspective.substack.com/p/a-tale-of-two-technologies These double standards really are holding back what should be the next public health revolution.
Such a great post, and so important! We're so close to adoption being possible its painful. I do think mass manufacturing of KrCl lamps wont be possible though and a new light source, LEDs, Second harmonic lasers, etc will be needed. I wrote a piece focusing on the development of far-UVC LEDs, which could mitigate many of those safety and efficiency issues.
https://thepotentialsurface.substack.com/p/far-uvc-and-the-history-of-the-blue?r=695xir
pm2.5 air pollution & co2 air levels? … hepa filters & hrv respectively deal with these issues.
Please fact check your suggestion that Covid 19 killed over 7M, it didn’t but inappropriate treatment certainly vastly elevated the death toll.
Yes, for COVID-19, 7M is just the reported deaths: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/deaths . A more likely estimate is around 20-40M: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-deaths-cumulative-economist-single-entity
Corsi-Rosenthal Box....the results are surprising.